Fact Check and Correction Policy

At EARMYU.com, accuracy is a core principle of our journalism. Our readers rely on us for trustworthy information related to finance, pensions, social security, and global economic developments. To maintain this trust, we follow a strict and transparent fact-checking process and a clear correction procedure whenever errors are identified.

This policy explains how we verify information, handle inaccuracies, and ensure that our content remains reliable at all times. Readers may also refer to our Editorial Policy, Disclaimer, and Terms and Conditions for additional transparency.

Purpose of This Policy

The goal of this Fact Check and Correction Policy is to ensure that every article published on EARMYU.com is:
• Accurate
• Evidence-based
• Transparent
• Free from intentional misinformation or misinterpretation

This policy applies to all forms of content, including news, explainers, analyses, and editorial articles.

Fact-Checking Standards

Before content is published, our editorial team follows a thorough verification process that includes:
• Reviewing official government releases, circulars, notifications, and policy documents
• Cross-checking reports with trusted sources such as government portals, regulatory bodies, financial institutions, and reputable organizations
• Validating data from more than one credible source
• Verifying figures, dates, scheme details, and policy changes with original authorities whenever possible

Writers are required to cite or link to source materials when necessary, ensuring transparency and allowing readers to verify information themselves.

Use of Credible Sources

To maintain high accuracy, we primarily use:
• Official government websites
• Ministry and department notifications
• Policy documents from statutory bodies
• Reports from recognized institutions and global agencies
• Information provided by verified spokespersons or officials
• Research from reputable financial and economic organizations

We do not rely on unverified social media posts, private messages, rumors, or unconfirmed reports.

Editorial Review

Every article goes through a multi-level editorial review that includes:
• Accuracy check
• Source verification
• Assessment for misleading or incomplete information
• Review for clarity, relevance, and compliance with our Editorial Policy

Articles are published only after passing this process.

Handling Errors

Despite our best efforts, mistakes can occasionally occur. When an error is identified—either by our team or by a reader—we follow a transparent correction procedure.

Correction Procedure

• Errors are investigated promptly after being reported
• If the error is confirmed, corrections are made as quickly as possible
• A note may be added at the bottom of the article indicating that it has been updated or corrected
• Substantial corrections may be highlighted clearly to maintain transparency
• If a headline or major section of an article contained an error, it is corrected immediately

We may revise the entire article if new information becomes available or if the previous information becomes outdated due to policy changes.

Reader-Submitted Corrections

We encourage readers to help us maintain accuracy.
If you notice any incorrect information, misleading detail, outdated content, or missing context, you may notify our team through our Contact Us page.

All feedback is reviewed seriously, and corrections are made in line with this policy.

Updating Content

Some information—especially related to pensions, government policies, and economic changes—may evolve over time. When new updates are released, we may revise previously published content to ensure readers have access to the most current information.

Updates may be made without a correction note when the changes are part of routine content refreshes rather than corrections.

Responsibility and Accountability

EARMYU.com is committed to:
• Publishing accurate and verified information
• Rectifying errors transparently
• Ensuring accountability in all reporting
• Maintaining strict internal editorial standards

Our readers’ trust is our most important responsibility, and we work continually to uphold it.